TTABlog Quarterly Index: January - March 2013
E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. You may also follow the blog on Twitter (here). And don't forget to leave your comments! Finally, please report any broken or inoperative links, as well as any errors and omissions, to the TTABlogger at jwelch at lalaw.com.
Section 2(a) - Deceptiveness:
- Precedential No. 9: TTAB Affirms 2(a) Deceptiveness Refusal of WHITE JASMINE for Tea
- TTAB Affirms Deceptiveness Refusal of "VALENCIA" for Rice
- Your Thoughts Regarding H.R. 1278 - the "Non-Disparagement of Native American Persons or Peoples in Trademark Registration Act of 2013"?
- Congressman Faleomavaega Introduces Bill To Cancel REDSKINS Registrations
- TTAB Affirms 2(a) Disparagement Refusal of STOP THE ISLAMISATION OF AMERICA
- CHAMPARTY Not Confusable With CHAMPAGNE for Sparkling Wine, Says TTAB
- KATZ Fight! TTAB Finds LIkelihood of Confusion but Dismisses Fraud Claim
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is DIRK for Sunglasses Confusable With DIRK BIKKEMSBERG for Spectacles?
- Precedential No. 6: Applicant's Rule 133 Amendment Yields Dismissal of 2(d) Opposition
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are VOLVO and LOVOL Confusable for Vehicles?
- Yankees Win! TTAB Sustains Opposition to "BASEBALLS EVIL EMPIRE" on Confusion and False Association Grounds
- Food Fight! TTAB Dismisses "WHERE FOOD COMES FROM" 2(d) Opposition
- TTAB Sustains 2(d) Opposition to WAL-ZYR, Finding it Confusable with ZYRTEC
- TTAB Deems "ANGEL" a Weak Formative in Computer Field, Reverses 2(d) Refusal
- WYHA? TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refusal of BRIX CELLARS over BRIX for Restaurant Services
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are These Design Marks for Batteries Confusingly Similar?
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability on these Three Section 2(d) Appeals
- Finding "U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE" Famous But Inherently Weak, TTAB Dismisses 2(d) Cancellation Petition
- Precedential No. 42: In Rare Section 2(d) Color Case, TTAB Affirms Refusal of Teal for Sheaths over Blue for Catheters
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability On These Five Mere Descriptiveness Refusals
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is "Property, intangible" Inherently Distinctive for an Intellectual Property Blog?
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is LIVEVIEW Merely Descriptive of Game Scouting Cameras?
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability on these Five Mere Descriptiveness Refusals
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability on these Three Mere Descriptiveness Refusals
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Does the Stylization of this Mark Render it Inherently Distinctive?
- Precedential No. 40: On Summary Judgment, TTAB Rejects Claim that SMS Number Is Merely Descriptive of Mobile Search Services
Section 2(e)(2)- Primarily Geographically Descriptive:
Section 2(e)(3) - Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive:
Section 2(e)(4) - Primarily Merely a Surname:
- Another Surnamed Law Firm Bites the TTAB Dust
- Precedential No. 2: TTAB Sustains Section 2(e)(4) Surname Opposition to "MILLER LAW GROUP" for Legal Services
- Precedential No. 7: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register Peppermint Flavor and Scent for Nitroglycerin Spray
- Precedential No. 3: TTAB Affirms Alternative Refusals to Register Pet Food Container Design, Finding it Functional or Non-Distinctive
Failure to Function:
- Precedential No. 7: TTAB Affirms Refusal to Register Peppermint Flavor and Scent for Nitroglycerin Spray
- Precedential No. 5: TTAB Affirms Failure-to-Function Refusal of Battery Charger "Chirp"
- Precedential No. 4: TTAB Affirms Failure-to-Function Refusal of BLATANCY for Audio Recordings by Eponymous Performer
- Precedential No. 3: TTAB Affirms Alternative Refusals to Register Pet Food Container Design, Finding it Functional or Non-Distinctive
- Precedential No. 1: TTAB Affirms Ornamentality Refusal of Clothing Trim Design Mark
- TTAB Finds MECHANIC to be Generic for ... Guess What?
- TTAB Finds "ITICKETS" Generic for .... Guess What?
Ownership:
Use in Commerce/Specimen of Use/Drawing:
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Has This Pizza Slice Mark Been Mutilated?
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability on this Trademark Specimen of Use
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Does the Stylization of this Mark Render it Inherently Distinctive?
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is This Specimen of Use Okay for the mark "JUXTA"?
- Precedential No. 41: TTAB Affirms SSFA CERTIFIED CODE COMPLIANT Refusal - Specimens Show Two Marks, Drawing One
Discovery/Evidence/Procedure:
- Precedential No. 6: Applicant's Rule 133 Amendment Yields Dismissal of 2(d) Opposition
- TTAB Confirms That Federal Registration Defense to Dilution Claim Lives On For Older Cases
- Precedential No. 39: Plaintiff That Relies Solely on a Supplemental Registration Cannot Prevail in a Section 2(d) Proceeding
- TTAB Vacates ROLEX No-Dilution Decision After AFP Withdraws Application During Appeal
Other:
- "BUSHWACKER" TTAB Brouhaha Heads to Federal District Court
- Erik Pelton's Summary of March 1st TPAC Public Meeting
- "REDSKINS" Disparagement Case Headlines TTAB's March 2013 Hearing Schedule
- U.S. Census Bureau "Frequently Occurring Surnames" from Census 2010
- TTAB Posts February 2013 Hearing Schedule
- District Court Lacks Power to Issue Subpoenas for TTAB Disqualification Petition
- What is an "Ongoing and Existing Business" For Purposes of the Anti-Trafficking Provision of Section 10?
- TTAB Posts January 2013 Hearing Schedule
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2012 [Part Two]
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2012 [Part One]
- Nevermind! USPTO Drops Idea of Moving Up Deadline for First Filing of Section 8 Declarations of Use
- The TTAB Issued 42 Precedential Decisions in 2012
- Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Already v. Nike, Finding Counterclaim Moot
- Foreign Trademark Owner Stumbles over U.S. Bona Fide Intent Requirement
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home