Thursday, March 14, 2013

TTABlog Collection of Section 2(e)(2) "Primarily Geographically Descriptive" Cases

I've been writing a response to a Section 2(e)(2) refusal, and I thought it would be useful for me and others to compile a list of TTABlog postings on the issue. The great majority of the decisions are not precedential, but even non-precedential decisions may be helpful in framing effective arguments and locating precedential support for them.


For a mark to be deemed primarily geographically descriptive under Section 2(e)(2), it must be shown that (1) the mark's primary significance is a generally known geographic location; (2) the relevant public would be likely to make a goods/place association, that is, would be likely to believe that the goods originate in the place named in the mark; and (3) the goods do originate in that place. When the goods do come from the location named, then a goods/place association may be presumed.

Marks found to be primarily geographically descriptive under Section 2(e)(2):

Marks found not to be primarily geographically descriptive under Section 2(e)(2):

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home