Monday, October 23, 2023

Kira-Khanh McCarthy: "The Curtain Falls on the RAPUNZEL Opposition: Law Professor Is Not Entitled to a Statutory Cause of Action"

The latest issue of the American Bar Association's Landslide Magazine includes an article by Wolf Greenfield's own Kira-Khanh McCarthy: "The Curtain Falls on the RAPUNZEL Opposition: Law Professor Is Not Entitled to a Statutory Cause of Action." You will recall that Law Professor Rebecca Curtin filed an opposition to registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for dolls. Applicant United Trademark Holdings, Inc., moved to dismiss the opposition for lack of "standing" on the ground that Professor Curtin is merely a consumer and not a toy manufacturer or competitor. Ms. McCarthy's article tells what happened at the TTAB and offers her insights as to the ramifications of the Board's ruling.

Update: On July 5, 2023, Professor Curtin filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Her opening brief is due on November 20, 2023. Meanwhile, the George Washington University Law School Intellectual Property & Technology Law Clinic has filed an amicus brief in support of Professor Curtin. [pdf here]. Stay tuned.

Read comments and post your comment here.

TTABlogger comment: FWIW: I think the CAFC will reverse.

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2023.

6 Comments:

At 8:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why do you say that? Can anyone concoct standing even if they are a mere intermeddler?

 
At 8:53 AM, Blogger John L. Welch said...

By calling her a "mere intermeddler" you are assuming the conclusion. Does her claim fall within the zone of interests protected by the statute? That's the question. See Section 45 of the Lanham Act, where the goals of the Act are set out.

 
At 9:30 AM, Blogger Arnie FRIEDE said...

Would be grateful for a link to the GW amicus brief.

 
At 10:35 AM, Blogger John L. Welch said...

GW amicus brief is here: https://454850.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/454850/GW%20amicus%20brief%2023-2140_Documents.pdf

 
At 11:50 AM, Blogger Joel said...

Read Corcamore, LLC v. SFM, LLC. There is no way, assuming the CAFC remains faithful to Corcamore, that they reverse the Board. I'll bet you a candy, John. One even with peanuts!

 
At 3:54 PM, Blogger John L. Welch said...

What odds are you giving me?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home