TTABlog Quarterly Index: January - March 2023
E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. Please report any broken or inoperative links, as well as any errors and omissions, to the TTABlogger at jwelch at wolfgreenfield.com.
Section 2(a) - Deceptiveness:
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:
- TTABlog Test: Is EVERWILD For Distilled Spirits Confusable With EVERCLEAR for Alcoholic Beverages? [Yes]
- TTABlog Test: Which of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed?"
- TTABlog Test: Is CAMP WALDO for Summer Camps Confusable with THE WALDO SCHOOL for Primary Schools? [Yes]
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Oppositions Turn Out?
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
- TTABlog Test: Which of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed?
- Precedential No. 10: TTAB Confirms that Once Opposer's Mark is Registered, Priority is No Longer an Issue
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Oppositions Turn Out?
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
- TTAB Sustains Section 2(d) Opposition to RAMEN HOOD & Design for Asian-Themed Restaurant Services
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
- Weakness of "LAGUNA" for Clothing Leads to Dismissal of Opposition to LB LAGUNA BEACH FOOTBALL CLUB & Design
- Super Bowl Special: Is TOUCHDOWN TIMEOUT for Sports Programming Confusable With TIME OUT for Event Production Services? [Yes]
- TTABlog Test: Is AGI2 for Lighting Fixtures Confusable With AGI & Design for Architectural Signage Lighting? [Yes]
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Oppositions Turn Out?
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
- Precedential No. 5: TTAB Finds ICE MONSTER & Design Confusable With MONSTER ENERGY for Restaurant Services
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Recent Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?
Section 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness:
- TTABlog Test: Which of These Three Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Refusals Was/Were Reversed?
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out?
- TTABlog Test: Is "SOUL FOOD MARKET" Merely Descriptive of Grocery Store Services? [Yes[
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out?
- TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Appeals Turn Out?
- Precedential No. 1: TTAB Affirms Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of "DXPORTAL" for an Internet Portal Providing Drug Prescription Information
Section 2(e)(2) - Primarily Geographically Descriptive:
Section 2(e)(4) - Primarily Merely a Surname:
- TTABlog Test: Is "THE HARRIMAN HOTEL" Primarily Merely a Surname for Hotel Services? [Yes]
- TTABlog Test: Is "REMO" Primarily Merely a Surname for Telecommunication Services?
Section 2(f) - Acquired Distinctiveness:
Failure-to-Function:
- Precedential No. 7: TTAB Reverses Failure-to-Function Refusal of Lizzo's "100% THAT BITCH" for Clothing Items
- "ASSHOLES LIVE FOREVER" Fails to Function as a Trademark, Says TTAB
Genericness:
- Fourth Circuit Affirms ED Va., Which Upheld TTAB Decision: GRUYERE is Generic for Cheese
- Precedential No. 8: TTAB Affirms Genericness Refusal of "NF-LIGHT" for Specimen Analysis Kits For Detecting Neurological Markers
- TTAB Affirms Genericness Refusal of the Color Dark Green for Medical Examination Gloves
- Granting Cancellation Petition, TTAB Finds SMART WALLET Generic for ..... Guess What?
Specimen of Use/Nonuse:
- Precedential No. 9: Business Card Specimen Does Not Prove Use of Collective Membership Mark, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 3: Rejecting Motion to Expand Identification of Goods, TTAB Sustains EN-D-FENDER Opposition for Nonuse
Pan American Convention:
Discovery/Evidence/Procedure:
- Precedential No. 10: TTAB Confirms that Once Opposer's Mark is Registered, Priority is No Longer an Issue
- TTAB Summarily Sustains BITVISION Opposition Due to Offensive Claim Preclusion
- TTAB Grants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Due to Vast Dissimilarity Between Marks
- Precedential No. 6: TTAB Requires Explanation of Cancellation Respondent's Deletion of Goods
- TTAB Sustains PRINCESS ROYAL Opposition as a Sanction for Non-Compliance with Discovery Order
- E.D. Texas Denies Motion to Stay Infringement Action in Favor of TTAB Proceeding
- Precedential No. 38: TTAB Orders Cancellation of COHIBA Registrations Under Pan American Convention, Rejects Issue Preclusion Defense
Entitlement to a Statutory Cause of Action:
- Precedential No. 4: Foreign Cancellation Petitioner Fails to Meet Lexmark Test for "Standing" But TTAB Allows Time to Amend Petition
- TTAB Tosses Out "BURNERWATER" Opposition Due to Failure to Plead and Prove Standing
Prosecution Issues:
CAFC Decisions:
- Guest Post by Michael Hall: "Ignoring Federal Circuit Precedent, the Board Toes the Line on the Burden of Proof for Genericness Refusals"
- The Trademark Reporter's 2023 "Annual Review" of U.S. Trademark Cases
- Bob Cumbow: "The Most Important Trademark Fact You Probably Don’t Know"
- Prof. Christine Haight Farley Explains the Pan American Convention and the COHIBA Decision
Other:
- TTAB Posts April 2023 Hearing Schedule
- TTAB Launches Pilot Program for Final Pretrial Conferences, Requiring Detailed Joint Pretrial Order
- TTABlog Test: Three Recent Affirmances - Guess What Grounds ....
- Three Recent TTAB Inter Partes Decisions, Briefly Noted
- TTAB Posts March 2023 Hearing Schedule
- TTABlog Flotsam and Jetsam, Issue No. 16: COHIBA Appeal (Again); TM Guide for 2(c) Refusals; LeBron Deposition
- TTAB Posts February 2023 Hearing Schedule
- In 2022, How Often Did the TTAB Affirm Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness/Disclaimer Refusals?
- In 2022, What Was The Rate of TTAB Affirmance of Section 2(d) Refusals to Register?
Text © John L. Welch 2023.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home