TTABlog Quarterly Index: July-September 2015
E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. You may also follow the blog on Twitter (here). And don't forget to leave your comments! [Note that E-mail subscribers may have to surf to the blog to see comments]. Finally, please report any broken or inoperative links, as well as any errors and omissions, to the TTABlogger at jwelch at wolfgreenfield.com.
Section 2(a) - Disparagement:
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:
- Precedential No. 34: MMMBop! TTAB FInds C.H. HANSON Confusable with HANSON for Hand Tools
- Precedental No. 33: North Face Gets Split Decision In Multi-Class Section 2(d) Opposition
- TTAB Test: Are Jams and Jellies Related to Beer for Section 2(d) Purposes? [Yes]
- Precedential No. 32: Orange Bang Wins "OLÉ" Section 2(d) Beverage Bullfight
- ASHCON Confusable With ASHCORE AND ASHCOLITE for Ash-Hauling Goods and Services, Says TTAB
- TTAB Test: Are Airline Services Related to Model Airplanes Under Section 2(d)? [Yes]
- Opposer Fails to Prove Acquired Distinctivess in MATTRESS OVERSTOCK, TTAB Dismisses Opposition
- TTAB Test: Which One of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was Reversed?
- Yet Another TTAB Test: Must "CLUB" Be Disclaimed for Vehicle Reservation Services? [Yes]
- Another TTAB Test: Is PURPLE HAZE for Guitar Pickups Confusable With HAZE for Amplifiers? [Yes]
- TTAB Test: How Would You Decide These Four Recent Appeals?
- TTAB Test: Which Two of These Four Section 2(d) Refusals Were Reversed?
- Precedential No. 27: Fame of BUD for Beer Brings Victory over WINEBUD for Wine
- TTAB Test: Are "THE PERFECT FACE" and "PARFAIT VISAGE" Confusable for Skin Care Products? [No]
- WYHA?" LOVE IS MY RELIGION" Confusable With "LOVE IS RELIGION" for Clothing, Says TTAB
- TTAB Test: Are MAYARI and MAYA Confusable for Wine? [No]
- Forget Parody: GOTHAM BATMEN Confusable with Famous BATMAN, Says Split TTAB Panel
- TTAB Test: Which of These Four Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed?
- Precedential No. 20: 13th du Pont Factor Yields TTAB 2(d) Reversal
- TTAB Test: Which One of These Four Section 2(d) Refusals Was Reversed?
- Precedential No. 16: MARAZUL and BLUE SEA Confusable for Seafood, Says TTAB
Section 2(e)(1) - Mere Descriptiveness:
- Precedential No. 35: TTABang! SMART SERIES Merely Descriptive of Firearm Safes
- TTAB Test: Which One of These Four Mere Descriptiveness Refusals Was Reversed?
- Precedential No. 31: "THCTea" Deceptively Misdescriptive of Tea-Based Beverages, Says TTAB
- "INDICES" Not Deceptively Misdescriptive of Healthcare Data Reporting, Says TTAB
Section 2(f) - Acquired Distinctiveness:
- Teardrop Design Mark is Product Shape, Needs Acquired Distinctiveness, Says TTAB
- TTAB Deflates Feeble Attacks on SWISSBIKE Application and SWISS MILITARY Registration for Bicycles
Failure to Function/Specimen of Use:
- TTAB Test: Are Jams and Jellies Related to Beer for Section 2(d) Purposes? [Yes]
- TTAB Test: Which One of these Three Refusals Was Reversed?
- TTAB Test: Is This Display of "SmartDGA" Inherently Distinctive? [No]
- TTAB Precedential No. 25: "WALK-IN-SHOPPER" Not Used As Source Indicator for Applicant's Services
- TTAB Affirms Refusal of Deer Logo with "Phantom" Antlers, for Coffee, on Four Grounds
Lack of Bona Fide Intent:
Non-use:
Ownership:
- Precedential No. 21: TTAB Sides With Band in "WONDERBREAD 5" Ownership Dispute
- Precedential No. 18: U.S. Seller, Not Foreign Manufacturer, Owns Trademark, TTAB Rules
Discovery/Evidence/Procedure:
- Eighth Circuit Directs District Court to Apply Preclusion in B&B v. Hargis
- Precedential No. 28: TTAB Denies Motion to Add Claim Preclusion Defense As Futile
- Precedential No. 26: TTAB Dismisses Opposition As Untimely, Denying Opposer Benefit of Another's Extension of Time
- Precedential No. 24: TTAB Summarily Dismisses Cancellation Petition Due to Claim Preclusion
- TTAB Grants Partial Summary Judgment in Cancellation Proceeding Based on Claim Preclusion
- Precedential No. 23: Abandonment and Opposition Filed on Same Day, TTAB Dismisses Opposition Without Prejudice
- Precedential No. 22: Unreasonable Party Loses Right to Substantive Objections to Document Requests
- Applying Claim Preclusion, TTAB Affirms 2(e)(1) Refusal of Re-filed RESTORE LIFT Application
- TTAB Deflates Feeble Attacks on SWISSBIKE Application and SWISS MILITARY Registration for Bicycles
- Precedential No. 19: PTO "Clear Error" Determination Not Reviewable by Petition or Appeal
- Precedential No. 17: TTAB Refuses to Vacate HOUNDSTOOTH MAFIA Decision
CAFC Decisions:
- CAFC Reverses TTAB: Paw Print Marks Not Confusingly Similar
- CAFC Affirms TTAB: FISH FRY PRODUCTS Lacks Acquired Distinctiveness, Disclaimer Required
- CAFC Reverses and Remands TTAB 2(d) Decision Due to Inadequate Appreciation of PEACE & LOVE
- Latest Version of TTAB's "Advanced Practice Tips"
- Recommended Reading: Alexandra Bistline, Trademark LItigation After B&B v. Hargis"
- Recommended Reading: Ted Davis, Federal Registration and the Constitutional Right to Petition
- Recommended Reading: Peter Karol, "The Constitutional Limitation on Trademark Propertization"
- Recommended Reading: William McGeveran, "The Imaginary Trademark Parody Crisis (And The Real One)"
- TTABlogger Article: "The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2014-2015" - Plus 40% Discount on "The IP Book"
- TTAB Posts September 2015 Hearing Schedule
- Two TTAB Administrative Trademark Judges Appointed
- USPTO/TTAB Seek Comments on Proposed Revision of Standard Protective Order
- TTAB Posts August 2015 Hearing Schedule
- TTAB Posts July 2015 Hearing Schedule
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home