TTAB Quarterly Index: April - June 2013
E-mail subscriptions to the TTABlog are available. Just enter your e-mail address in the box on the right to receive a daily update via Feedblitz. You may also follow the blog on Twitter (here). And don't forget to leave your comments! Finally, please report any broken or inoperative links, as well as any errors and omissions, to the TTABlogger at jwelch at lalaw.com.
Section 2(a) - Deceptiveness:
- TTABlog Collection of Section 2(a) Deceptiveness Cases
- TTAB Affirms 2(a) Deceptiveness Refusal of IRON-TEK CLEAN PERFORMANCE for Nutritional Supplements
- TTAB Affirms 2(a) and 2(e)(1) Refusals of GREEN SEAL for Non-Environmentally-Friendly Adhesive Tape
Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:
- Finding Likely Confusion With REGISTERED MAIL, TTAB Cancels Registrations For REGISTERED E-MAIL and (R)EGISTERED E-MAIL
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are Pet Apparel and Human Clothing Related?
- Precedential No. 23: CHEMIN DES PAPES Not Confusable with CHATEAUNEUF-DU-PAPE CONTROLE for Wine, Says TTAB
- TTAB Reverses 2(d) Refusal of BACIO: Not Confusable with KISS for Restaurant Services
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are STELLA ROSSA PIZZA BAR and RED STAR TAVERN Confusable?
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Are ROUGH COUNTRY and WILD COUNTRY Confusable for Tires?
- TTAB Dismisses 2(d) Opposition: TAMAYA Not Confusable With MAYA, Both For Wine
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Which One of These Four Section 2(d) Refusals Did the Board Reverse?
- What is the Likelihood That the TTAB Will Affirm a Section 2(d) Refusal? 90%
- TTAB Finds "Translucent Blue" Color Confusable with "Blue" Color for Fuel Additives
- Precedential No. 16: TTAB Refuses to Consider File HIstory of Cited Registration in Section 2(d) Appeal
- TTABlog Uncorked: Collection of Section 2(d) Cases Involving Wine
- "IN & OUT CAR WASH" Not Confusable With, Nor Dilutive of, "IN-N-OUT" Burgers Marks, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 14: Refusing to Read Cited Registration Narrowly, TTAB Affirms 2(d) Refusal of LOTUS for Casino Bar Services
- TTAB Affirms Disclaimer Requirement of MONOGRAM in BR MONOGRAM for Handbags and Clothing
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Must NATURALLY be Disclaimed in NATURALLY POWERED for All-Natural Beverages?
- WYHA? TTAB Affirms Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of PADPIVOT for Pad Computer Stands
- Divided TTAB Panel Finds OPEN SOURCE HARDWARE Merely Descriptive of Technology Website Services
- TTAB Affirms 2(a) and 2(e)(1) Refusals of GREEN SEAL for Non-Environmentally-Friendly Adhesive Tape
- What is the Likelihood of TTAB Affirmance of a Section 2(e) Refusal?
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Which One of These Five Section 2(e)(1) Mere Descriptiveness Refusals Was Reversed?
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is "SOF" Merely Descriptive of Exercise Weights?
- TTAB Affirms Geographical Descriptiveness Refusal of NEWBRIDGE HOME for Household Goods
- TTAB Reverses 2(e)(2) Refusal: KAPALUA Not Geographically Descriptive of Retail Store Services
Section 2(e)(4) - Primarily Merely a Surname:
- TTAB Affirms Surname Refusal of MOTT'S for Baby Food
- TTABlog Collection of Section 2(e)(4) "Primarily Merely A Surname" Cases
- TTABlog Collection of Section 2(e)(5) Functionality Decisions
- Precedential No. 10: Finding Aesthetic Functionality, TTAB Affirms 2(e)(5) Refusal of Black Color for Floral Packaging
- TTAB Affirms Failure-to-Function Refusal of Universal Peace Symbol
- Precedential No. 22: WYHA? TTAB Affirms Failure-to-Function Refusal of "No More RINOs!" for Bumper Stickers, T-Shirts, and Buttons
- TTAB Affirms Refusal of Clear Cube Package for Parlor Games as Not Inherently Distinctive
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability on these Two Genericness Appeals
- TTAB Affirms Genericness Refusal of POMEGRANATEA for Tea-Based Beverages
- Test Your TTAB Judge-Ability on this Trademark Specimen of Use
- Precedential No. 17: Use of TREASURYNET Mark Only Internally Results in Cancellation due to Abandonment
- Precedential No. 12: WYHA? TTAB Affirms Refusal of PLAQUE-ZAPPER for Pet Treats Due to Faulty Specimen of Use
Fraud:
- TTAB Dismisses Fraud Claim for Lack of Proof of Intent to Deceive
- SDNY Orders Cancellation of NISA SANTIAGO Registration on the Ground of Fraud
Lack of Bona Fide Intent:
Discovery/Evidence/Procedure:
- CAFC Reverses TTAB Dismissal, Finding No Issue or Claim Preclusion from Levi's Failed "Stitch Design" Lawsuit
- Precedential No. 21: TTAB Dismisses Belatedly-Filed Opposition, Rejects Claim of Privity With Extension Recipient
- Precedential No. 20: Cancellation Respondent Can't Undo Voluntary Surrender of Registration
- Precedential No. 19: TTAB Admits Disputed Documents, Denies Summary Judgment, Suggests ACR
- Precedential No. 18: Parties Opt for ACR, Foregoing Discovery, Trial, and Final Argument
- Divided 8th Circuit Panel Says TTAB 2(d) Decision Has No Preclusive Effect in Infringment Suit
- Precedential No. 17: Use of TREASURYNET Mark Only Internally Results in Cancellation due to Abandonment
- Precedential No. 15: TTAB Requires FRCP 26(a)(2)(B) Written Report of "Retained" Expert Witness
- Precedential No. 13: TTAB Nixes Stipulation for Service By E-Mail And Five Extra Mailing Days
CAFC Decisions:
Recommended Reading:
- Anthony L. Fletcher: "Separating Descriptive Sheep From Generic Goats"
- Ted Davis: Annual Review of U.S. Federal and State Case Law
- INTA Outline: 2012-2013 Decisions of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and the Federal Circuit on Registrability Issues
- "Stolen Valor and the First Amendment: Does Trademark Infringement Law Leave Congress an Opening"
- TTAB Posts June 2013 Hearing Schedule
- TTAB Posts May 2013 Hearing Schedule
- What is the Likelihood of TTAB Affirmance of a Section 2(e) Refusal?
- TTAB Posts April 2013 Hearing Schedule
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home