Nevermind! USPTO Drops Idea of Moving Up Deadline for First Filing of Section 8 Declarations of Use
You will recall that last Fall, the USPTO sought comments on a potential amendment to the Trademark Act that would have changed the first filing deadline for Affidavits or Declarations of Use or Excusable Nonuse under Sections 8 and 71 of the Trademark Act from between the fifth and sixth years after the registration date (or the six-month grace period that follows), to between the third and fourth years after the registration date (or the following six-month grace period). See TTABlog posting here.
Well, nevermind. Based on the comments received, the USPTO has decided to shelve that idea. It recently posted the following notice (here):
On August 16, 2012, the USPTO published a notice inviting the public to submit written comments on a potential legislative change to amend the first filing deadline for Affidavits or Declarations of Use or Excusable Nonuse under Sections 8 and 71 of the Trademark Act from between the fifth and sixth years after the registration date, or the six-month grace period that follows, to between the third and fourth years after the registration date, or the six-month grace period that follows (77 FR 49425 (August 16, 2012)). A review of the comments submitted reveals that although many commenters expressed concern regarding registrations that are no longer in use in connection with some or all of the goods/services listed, the predominant sentiment was that the deadline should not be shortened. Several commenters also noted that further research and data were necessary to support a legislative change to the deadline. To that end, the USPTO notes that it is currently conducting a post-registration pilot program to gather information regarding the accuracy of identifications of goods/services for registered marks. (77 FR 30197 (May 22, 2012)).
Read comments and post your comment here.
2 Comments:
Let's hope that the USPTO does their homework on this as they suggest. The proposed move would help to try to stem the amount of deadwood piling up within the register. A quick analysis we performed on registrations renewed (Sect 8 filings of use) from all 2005 filings showed that there is actually more deadwood than active registrations in the register, based on this reference year. You can see our analysis here
http://towergatesoftware.com/blog/2012/09/06/making-the-case-to-amend-uspto-section-8-deadlines/
Is a "quick analysis" of some renewed registrations from one year statistically significant or persuasive?
Post a Comment
<< Home