The TTABlog®
Keeping Tabs on the TTABTM
by John L. Welch
Tuesday, October 30, 2012

JLW Articles
- 2012-2013 Decisions of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board and the Federal Circuit on Registrability Issues
- The Sixty-Fifth Year of Administration of the U.S. Trademark (Lanham) Act of 1946
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2011-2012
- The Sixty-Fourth Year of Administration of the U.S. Trademark (Lanham) Act of 1946
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2011 [Part II]
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2011 [Part I]
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions in 2010-2011
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2009-2010
- Fraud and the TTAB: What Hath Bose Wrought?
- TTAB developments: Bose and beyond
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2009®
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2008® (Part I)
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2008® [Part II])
- TTAB Year in Review (2008)
- Unfriendly Shores? Recent Developments in U.S. Law May Trouble Foreign Trademark Owners (with Ann Lamport Hammitte)
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2007®
- TTAB 2007 Update: Rules, Rulings, and Repercussions (with Ann Lamport Hammitte)
- Fraud for Thought: Can Fraud be Avoided by Correcting a False Statement Prior to Publication? (with Ann Lamport Hammitte)
- The TTAB in 2006: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2006® [Part 1 of 2]
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2006® [Part 2 of 2]
- The TTAB and Foreign Website Evidence: Quo Vadis? (with Ann Lamport Hammitte)
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2005
- The Ten Worst TTAB Decisions of 2005?
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2004
- The TTAB in 2004: What Was Hot, What Was Not
- 2004 at the TTAB: 12 Citables and 3 Precedential CAFC Decisions
- Six Potential Pitfalls in Trademark Prosecution
- Trade Dress and the TTAB
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2003
- The TTAB in 2003 [Part I]
- The TTAB in 2003 [Part II]
- Dilution at the TTAB
- TTAB Practice and the Madrid Rule Changes (with Ann Lamport Hammitte)
- The Top Ten Losing TTAB Arguments
TTABlog Archives


2 Comments:
I'm not willing to call this bullying because I have no idea how strong - or how diluted - shark designs are for clothing. I am old enough to recall a time when the Izod alligator was worth something. It was worth a lot and was a valuable mark on a line of clothing. the owners at the time (General Mills) went after anyone who put any similar looking creature (including crocodile) on clothes. Regrettably, the brand was counterfeited and line-extended to near death and has come back to life a bit in the last few years.
Is Greg Norman the only shark in the pool for clothing? If so, then I get trying to protect the equity and not watch it get chipped away.
I am only troubled by the idea of doing piecemeal prosecution of the case in the TTAB on less than all of the duPont factors
Any plaintiff could move for partial summary judgment on the issues of standing and priority if it owns a principal registration and no counterclaim for cancellation is filed. Should the Board entertain such motions? Isn't it a waste of everyone's time?
Post a Comment
<< Home