The TTABlog®
Keeping Tabs on the TTABTM
by John L. Welch
Wednesday, May 04, 2011

Recent Articles
- The Sixty-Fourth Year of Administration of the U.S. Trademark (Lanham) Act of 1946
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2011 [Part II]
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2011 [Part I]
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions in 2010-2011
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2009-2010
- Fraud and the TTAB: What Hath Bose Wrought?
- TTAB developments: Bose and beyond
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2009®
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2008® (Part I)
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2008® [Part II])
- TTAB Year in Review (2008)
- Unfriendly Shores? Recent Developments in U.S. Law May Trouble Foreign Trademark Owners (with Ann Lamport Hammitte)
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2007®
- TTAB 2007 Update: Rules, Rulings, and Repercussions (with Ann Lamport Hammitte)
- Fraud for Thought: Can Fraud be Avoided by Correcting a False Statement Prior to Publication? (with Ann Lamport Hammitte)
- The TTAB in 2006: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2006® [Part 1 of 2]
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2006® [Part 2 of 2]
- The TTAB and Foreign Website Evidence: Quo Vadis? (with Ann Lamport Hammitte)
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2005
- The Ten Worst TTAB Decisions of 2005?
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2004
- The TTAB in 2004: What Was Hot, What Was Not
- 2004 at the TTAB: 12 Citables and 3 Precedential CAFC Decisions
- Six Potential Pitfalls in Trademark Prosecution
- Trade Dress and the TTAB
- The Top Ten TTAB Decisions of 2003
- The TTAB in 2003 [Part I]
- The TTAB in 2003 [Part II]
- Dilution at the TTAB
- TTAB Practice and the Madrid Rule Changes (with Ann Lamport Hammitte)
- The Top Ten Losing TTAB Arguments
TTABlog Archives


2 Comments:
Yes, but since it's hip to be square, now I'm confused. Does this mean by attending we're NOT hip? Somehow that doesn't seem right....
LOL. Is that Father Schwimmer in the back?
Post a Comment
<< Home