Thursday, August 21, 2025

TTABlog Test: How Did These Three Section 2(d) Appeals Turn Out?

Section 2(d) affirmances continue to run at about 90% this year (as usual). Here are three recent appeals. No hints this time. How do you think they came out? [Answer in first comment].

In re Little Mexico LLC, Serial No. 98111934 (August 14, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. Goodman). [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark LITTLE MEXICO for "Take-out restaurant services" [MEXICO disclaimed] in view of the registered mark shown below, for "Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant services" [MEXICO and ESTABLISHED 1955 disclaimed.]


In re Crystal Factor, LLC, Serial No. 98593860 (August 15, 2025) (Opinion by Judge Robert Lavache) [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark IT'S THE BOMB for “Erotic non-medicated bath bombs, erotic non-medicated soaps, non-medicated bubble bath, and erotic non-medicated bath accessories being soap in the form of bath toys," in view of the registered mark DA BOMB for "bath and body products, namely, bath fizzer bombs; bath salts, not for medical purposes; bath preparations, not for medical purposes" [BOMB disclaimed].

In re The Breadfruit Company LLC, Serial No. 98271727 (August 18, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jessica B. Bradley). [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark BIG MARBLE for "soft drinks, namely sodas" in view of the registered marks MARBLE POP for "carbonated soft drinks" [POP disclaimed] and RED MARBLE for, inter alia, soft drinks.]

Read comments and post your comment here.

TTABlogger comment: How did you do? See any WYHA?s ?

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2025.

4 Comments:

At 5:47 AM, Blogger John L. Welch said...

All refusals were affirmed.

 
At 7:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I’m annoyed by the marble registration. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codd-neck_bottle — deceptively misdescriptive!

 
At 11:13 AM, Blogger Scott Brown said...

I disagree with the bath bomb one. "Bomb" is 100% generic for these products and these marks are extremely weak. I think "IT'S THE" and "DA" are sufficiently different here considering how weak these marks are. The reasoning is overbaked.

 
At 1:38 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

No surprises there.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home