Friday, May 30, 2025

TTABlog Test: Which of These Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Overturned on Appeal?

The TTAB affirmance rate for Section 2(d) appeals last year fell just under 90%. So far this year it's back to 90%. Here are three recent Board decisions, at least one of which reversed the refusal. How do you think they came out? [Answer in first comment].

In re Yolee’s Meal Prep LLC, Serial No. 97106121 (May 21, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. Goodman). [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown below for "Processed algae for human consumption in the nature of dried edible sea moss from Caribbean islands; Algae food beverages, namely, sea moss drinks; Processed algae for human consumption, namely, edible sea moss gel" [MOSS disclaimed], in view of the registered mark LADYBOSS for “Dietary supplements."

In re Random Life, Serial No. 98271953 (May 27, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Mark A. Thurmon). [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark REVALIA for “Jewelry; Jewelry brooches; Jewelry rings; Necklaces" in view of t he registered mark REVOLIA for, among other things, "Jewelry," "Jewelry brooches," "Rings being jewelry," and “Necklaces."]

In re Syracuse Label Company, Inc., Serial No. 97614824 (May 28, 2025) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. Pologeorgis). [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark NEXTGEN LABEL GROUP for “labels printed on pressure-sensitive paper substrates,” “flexible packaging, namely pouches and containers, made from polymer films,” and “labels printed on pressure-sensitive polymer films" [LABEL GROUP disclaimed], in view of the registered marks (different owners) NEXT GENERATION PACKAGING for, among other things, “Packaging containers, all being made of plastic or a combination of plastics and other materials, the plastics predominating; Containers, primarily made of plastic, sold empty, namely, containers for commercial use; Containers, not of metal, for commercial or industrial use" and NEXGEN PACKAGING for “Paper identification tags” [PACKAGING disclaimed in both registrations].

Read comments and post your comment here.

TTABlogger comment: How did you do? See any WYHA?s ?

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2025.

2 Comments:

At 6:27 AM, Blogger John L. Welch said...

The first one was reversed due to the difference in the marks, with slight help from the purchaser care factor. The other two were affirmed.

 
At 5:41 PM, Blogger BOB KELSON said...

I agree with the TTAB decisions. They were straight forward in my view.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home