![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhOBP-0KQvZjsuM5zFv__e6MXHeGTbKSnB9pwSb8awESkICuwpligkSKDvv8Csgpb8QVS8GwB7N5VShLTGanJGreKYhqc49ItetDTvhcjNmsO2U2m_vD2RVWSK_BUfnk7fbLeM4/s320/TTABlog+seal.png)
Two of these decision were precedential (all affirmances):
- TOURBILLON & Design for""jewellery, horological and chronometric instruments."
- YOUR CLOUD for cloud-computing related services.
Does this mean that practitioners are bringing many worthless appeals? That the USPTO examining attorneys are doing a good job? That the cost of an appeal is so low that it's worth a shot?
Read comments and post your comment here.
TTABlog note: Last year, the mere descriptiveness affirmance rate was about 82%. For last year's estimates, go here.
Text copyright John L. Welch 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment