The legal differences between the concept of use in the United States and in the EU are not merely technical. While in the United States, generally, "the owner of a mark may not monopolize markets that his trade has never reached," this may be possible in the EU. In this article, we will look at the European and U.S. treatments of "use" as a trademark concept and consider which (if either) is better, and why.
* * *
The European registration-based system is a natural result of a philosophy of open and equal competition across the Community. The U.S. use-based system is a direct result of the United States Constitution and the understanding of trademarks as nothing outside of an identifier of source for goods or services and primarily a method of protecting the consuming public from confusion. Both systems require use to a lesser or greater extent, and both systems are flexible in varying degrees. But the differences are stark and only become greater as the trajectories of these different philosophies become clear.
Read comments and post your comment here
TTABlog note: Again I thank The Trademark Reporter for granting permission to provide links to this article, which is Copyright © 2014 the International Trademark Association and reprinted with permission from The Trademark Reporter®, 105 TMR No. 6 (November-December 2014).
Text Copyright John L. Welch 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment