Monday, March 13, 2023

TTABlog Test: Which of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Reversed?

The Board has affirmed the first 25 Section 2(d) refusals that it reviewed this year. Here are three more, but at least one was reversed. How do you think these three cases came out? [Results in first comment].

YG Entertainment Inc., Serial No. 79975600 (March 9, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. Cataldo) [Section 2(d) refusal of BABYMONSTERS, in stylized form, for toy animals, stuffed toys, and other toys, in view of the registered mark BABY MONSTERS, in standard form, for baby furniture.] 


Dolphin Instruments and Gauges, Inc., Serial No. 88578059 (March 9, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Robert H. Coggins). [Section 2(d) refusal of DOLPHIN for "Fuel gauges; Level gauges; Odometers; Pressure gauges; Speedometers; Tachometers; Water Temperature gauges; all of the above exclusively only for use with classic cars and kit cars," in veiw of the registered mark POWERDOLPHIN for, inter alia, exhausts for motors and engine, mufflers for motors and engines, direction signals for vehicles, and suspension shock absorbers for vehicles.]

Patch Boys International LLC, Serial No. 90242361 (March 9, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. Goodman) [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark THE PATCH BOYS & Design for "Drywall contractor services; General construction contracting," in view of the registered mark PATCHMAN, in standard character and logo form, for "Building construction, remodeling and repair; Building maintenance and repair."]

Read comments and post your comment

TTABlog comment: How did you do? See any WYHA?s

Text Copyright John L. Welch 2023.


At 7:28 AM, Blogger John L. Welch said...

The third one was reversed.


Post a Comment

<< Home